Please read our copyright
disclaimer statement before proceeding. These tables are intended
as a tool to make the information available from the AKC Gazettes more
easily accessible. Feel free to use this tool at your own discretion.
|
|||||||
| AKC charge. (Gazette Issue) |
|
|||||||
| for having refused to permit an inspection of records and practices. |
|
|||||||
| for having refused to permit an inspection of records and practices. |
|
|||||||
| for failure to comply with recordkeeping and identification requirements; and for conduct prejudicial to the best interests of purebred dogs - based on her conviction in Shannon County (MO) Associate Circuit Court of 23 counts of animal abuse. |
|
|||||||
| for failure to comply with the record keeping and identification requirements. (2/00) |
|
|||||||
| for refusal to make her dogs and records available for inspection when requested. (01/05) |
|
|||||||
| for refusal to make his dogs and records available for inspection when requested. (01/05) |
|
|||||||
| failure to comply with recordkeeping and identification. |
|
|||||||
| for having refused to permit an inspection of records and practices. |
|
|||||||
| for having refused to permit an inspection of records and practices. |
|
|||||||
| based on his plea of guilty to seven counts of animal neglect in the Iowa District Court of Muscatine County, Iowa .(5/04) |
|
|||||||
| for having refused to permit an inspection of records and practices.(1/04) |
|
|||||||
| made false certification to AKC in connection with the registration of a Golden Retriever litter whelped in the Philippines. |
|
|||||||
| for having refused to permit an inspection of records and practices. |
|
|||||||
| in connection with his conviction in Harris County (TX) District Court of animal cruelty. |
|
|||||||
| For failure to comply with the recordkeeping and identification requirements. (5/00) |
|
|||||||
| suspended from all AKC privileges based on her plea of no contest to three counts of animal cruelty in the Terrebonne Parish District Court, Houma, Louisiana. Further, a $2000 fine was imposed. (6/06) |
|
|||||||
| refused to permit an inspection of records and practices. |
|
|||||||
| based on his conviction in Kenton County Court, State of Kentucky, of Animal Cruelty. (9/03) |
|
|||||||
| having refused to permit an inspection of records and practices. During the period of her suspension, AKC received numerous complaints alleging that Ms Hallum was circumventing the conditions of her suspension by attending AKC events in a capacity other than a spectator, entering dogs in AKC events under other names, and dealing in AKC registered dogs. As a result of these infractions, the AKC Board of Directors imposed an additional $1,000 fine and extended her suspension for another five years.(2/04) |
|
|||||||
| convicted by Douglas County Court (NE) of seven counts of animal cruelty. |
|
|||||||
| for failure to comply with the recordkeeping and identification requirements. (3/00) |
|
|||||||
| for failure to comply with the recordkeeping and identification requirements. (3/00) |
|
|||||||
| for failure to comply with the recordkeeping and identification requirements. (3/00) |
|
|||||||
| for failure to comply with the recordkeeping and identification requirements. (3/00) |
|
|||||||
| for failure to comply the the recordkeeping and identification requirements. |
|
|||||||
| for failure to comply with recordkeeping and identification requirements. |
|
|||||||
| failure to comply with recordkeeping and identification. |
|
|||||||
| for failure to comply with recordkeeping and identification requirements. |
|
|||||||
| made false certification in connection with the registration of two Chow Chow litters. |
|
|||||||
| failure to comply with recordkeeping and identification. |
|
|||||||
| convicted by the Lehigh County (PA) District Court of animal cruelty. |
|
|||||||
| for failure to comply with recordkeeping and identification requirements. |
|
|||||||
| suspended from all AKC privileges for refusal to make her dogs and records available for inspection when requested. A $2,000 fine was also imposed. (4/06) |
|
|||||||
| for failure to comply with the record keeping and identification requirements. |
|
|||||||
| for failure to comply with the record keeping and identification requirements. |
|
|||||||
| refused to permit an inspection of records and practices. |
|
|||||||
| failure to comply with recordkeeping and identification. |
|
|||||||
| refused to permit an inspection of records and practices. |
|
|||||||
| failure to comply with recordkeeping and identification. |
|
|||||||
| for failure to comply with the record keeping and identification requirements. |
|
|||||||
| refused to permit an inspection of records and practices. |
|
|||||||
| failure to comply with record keeping and identification requirements. |
|
|||||||
| failure to comply with record keeping and identification requirements. |
|
|||||||
| for failure to comply with recordkeeping and identification requirements. |
|
|||||||
| for failure to comply with the recordkeeping and identification requirements. (11/01) |
|
|||||||
| for failure to comply with the recordkeeping and identification requirements. (11/01) |
|
|||||||
| for failure to comply with recordkeeping and identification requirements. |
|
|||||||
| Athena Lethcoe Harman, and John Harman, were found guilty of animal cruelty by the Teton County Justice of the Peace Court in Chateau, MT. The case involved 108 charges. They had been charged under AKC disciplinary procedures for not being in compliance with AKC's identification requirements, and for their failure to maintain their dogs and facilities in a manner acceptable to the AKC. (8/03) |
|
|||||||
| John Harman, and Athena Lethcoe Harman, were found guilty of animal cruelty by the Teton County Justice of the Peace Court in Chateau, MT. The case involved 108 charges. They had been charged under AKC disciplinary procedures for not being in compliance with AKC's identification requirements, and for their failure to maintain their dogs and facilities in a manner acceptable to the AKC. (8/03) |
|
|||||||
| failed to maintain adequate and accurate records on their dog transactions and that they failed to properly identify their dogs. |
|
|||||||
| failed to maintain adequate and accurate records on their dog transactions and that they failed to properly identify their dogs. |
|
|||||||
| failed to maintain adequate and accurate records on their dog transactions and that they failed to properly identify their dogs. |
|
|||||||
| failed to maintain adequate and accurate records on their dog transactions and that they failed to properly identify their dogs. |
|
|||||||
| for having refused to permit an inspection of records and practices. |
|
|||||||
| for failure to comply with recordkeeping and identification requirements. (3/00) |
|
|||||||
| for failure to comply with recordkeeping and identification requirements. (3/00) |
|
|||||||
| for failure to comply with recordkeeping and identification requirements. (3/00) |
|
|||||||
| refused to permit inspection of records and practices. |
|
|||||||
| for failure to maintain their dogs and facilities in a manner acceptable to the AKC, and for failure to comply with the rules and regulations for record keeping and identification. |
|
|||||||
| for failure to maintain their dogs and facilities in a manner acceptable to the AKC, and for failure to comply with the rules and regulations for record keeping and identification. |
|
|||||||
| for having refused to permit an inspection of records and practices. |
|
|||||||
| for having refused to permit an inspection of records and practices. |
|
|||||||
| for failure to comply with the record keeping and identification requirements. |
|
|||||||
| for failure to comply with the record keeping and identification requirements. |
|
|||||||
| refused to permit inspection or records and practices. a.k.a. Sharon Wolgamot |
|
|||||||
| For having refused to permit an inspection of records and practices. |
|
|||||||
| for having refused to permit an inspection of records and practices. |
|
|||||||
| having submitted, or caused to be submitted, two litter registration applications which she knew, should have known, or had a duty to know, contained false certifications, and for failure to comply with the rules and regulations for recordkeeping and identification. |
|
|||||||
| based on her conviction in the Court of Common Pleas, Westmore County (PA) of Animal Cruelty. |
|
|||||||
| for failure to comply with recordkeeping and identification requirements. |
|
|||||||
| refused to permit an inspection of records and practices. |
|
|||||||
| for her having been found guilty of cruelty to animals in the Superior Court of Los Angeles, North District, CA. (12/04) |
|
|||||||
| for conduct considered prejudicial to the best interests of purebred dogs in connection with his conviction in Commonwealth of Pennsylvania District Court of Animal Cruelty.(6/02) |
|
|||||||
| for conduct considered prejudicial to the best interests of purebred dogs in connection with his conviction in Commonwealth of Pennsylvania District Court of Animal Cruelty.(6/02) |
|
|||||||
| failure to comply with recordkeeping and identification. |
|
|||||||
| for failure to comply with the recordkeeping and identification requirements.(7/01) |
|
|||||||
| for failure to comply with the record keeping and identification requirements. |
|
|||||||
| based on his conviction in the state of Nebraska's Department of Health of animal cruelty. |
|
|||||||
| in connection with her conviction of an animal neglect charge in the Vernon County (WI) Circuit Court. |
|
|||||||
| for having refused to permit an inspection of records and practices. (2/03) |
|
|||||||
| for having refused to permit an inspection of records and practices. (2/03) |
|
|||||||
| for having refused to permit an inspection of records and practices. |
|
|||||||
| for having refused to permit an inspection of records and practices. |
|
|||||||
| refused inspection of records and practices. |
|
|||||||
| refused inspection of records and practices. |
|
|||||||
| for having refused to permit an inspection of records and practices. (9/04) |
|
|||||||
| for having refused to permit an inspection of records and practices. (9/04) |
|
|||||||
| failure to comply with record keeping and identification requirements. |
|
|||||||
| failure to comply with record keeping and identification requirements. |
Return to AKC Suspension Index
Return
to Bark Bytes Home